From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Publish autovacuum informations |
Date: | 2015-01-05 16:44:13 |
Message-ID: | CAECtzeWkxwqcAE5VfzkSjk44Xsa0GdTL36d9UaHNvVQ-cG-9xg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2015-01-05 17:40 GMT+01:00 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > I'd be all right with putting the data structure declarations in a file
> > named something like autovacuum_private.h, especially if it carried an
> > annotation that "if you depend on this, don't be surprised if we break
> > your code in future".
>
> Works for me. I am not in general surprised when we do things that
> break my code, or anyway, the code that I'm responsible for
> maintaining. But I think it makes sense to segregate this into a
> separate header file so that we are clear that it is only exposed for
> the benefit of extension authors, not so that other things in the core
> system can touch it.
>
>
I'm fine with that too. I'll try to find some time to work on that.
Thanks.
--
Guillaume.
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2015-01-05 16:45:22 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Change how first WAL segment on new timeline after promotion is |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-01-05 16:40:20 | Re: Publish autovacuum informations |