Le mer. 1 déc. 2021 à 19:48, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> a écrit :
> Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> writes:
> > @Guillaume: Even if memory use with the patch isn't constant, I imagine
> it's
> > enough to have avoided OOM.
>
> I think it's good enough in HEAD. In the back branches, the sinval
> queue growth is bad enough that there's still an issue. Still,
> this is a useful improvement, so I added some comments and pushed it.
>
>
Thanks.
--
Guillaume.