From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Christofides <michael(at)pgmustard(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Proposals for EXPLAIN: rename ANALYZE to EXECUTE and extend VERBOSE |
Date: | 2024-12-11 12:41:09 |
Message-ID: | CAECtzeW38Dq89womdATHnwR7c0sv1FxaT6k8c_9xUGjmQnkAHg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Le mer. 11 déc. 2024 à 12:16, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> a écrit :
> On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 at 22:38, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I've pushed the main patch. I'm not planning on pushing the
> > auto_explain.log_buffers default change unless there's a bit more
> > discussion about it.
>
> There were a few places that were missing a BUFFERS OFF as indicated
> by the buildfarm. I've fixed a few of these, but there's at least one
> more in pg_stat_statements's level_tracking.sql. I'm currently running
> a -DRELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE -DCATCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE enabled make
> check-world. It's going to take a while, so I'll hold off doing yet
> another commit to fix these until I see if the level_tracking.sql one
> is the last issue to fix.
>
>
Sorry for all those late fixes. I'll refrain from saying "Sure looks easy
enough to do" from now on :) Guess this is a great example of what Robert
said in
http://rhaas.blogspot.com/2024/05/hacking-on-postgresql-is-really-hard.html
.
Anyway, thanks again for your work on this.
--
Guillaume.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | jian he | 2024-12-11 12:42:26 | Re: NOT ENFORCED constraint feature |
Previous Message | Ryohei Takahashi (Fujitsu) | 2024-12-11 12:18:23 | RE: COPY performance on Windows |