From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: "Multiple table synchronizations are processed serially" still happens |
Date: | 2021-05-21 13:17:43 |
Message-ID: | CAECtzeVtn0H8GNEFZKi-Cpf3LXE6BL1neDVNCMrskdidA59bsA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Le ven. 21 mai 2021 à 05:43, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> a écrit :
> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 1:30 AM Guillaume Lelarge
> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> If so, the
> >> problem might be that copying the data of the first table creates a
> >> transaction which blocks creation of the slot for second table copy.
> >
> >
> > I don't understand how a transaction could block the creation of a slot.
> Could you explain that to me?
> >
>
> During the creation of the slot
During the creation of the slot or during the creation of the subscription?
because, in my tests, I create the slot before creating the snapshot.
> , we need to build the initial snapshot
> which is used for decoding WAL. Now, to build the initial snapshot, we
> wait for all running xacts to finish. See functions
> CreateReplicationSlot() and SnapBuildFindSnapshot().
>
>
If we have two workers, both will have a snapshot? they don't share the
same snapshot?
And if all this is true, I don't see how it could work when the replication
happens between two clusters, and couldn't work when it happens with only
one cluster.
--
Guillaume.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-05-21 13:25:02 | Re: Installation of regress.so? |
Previous Message | osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com | 2021-05-21 12:44:31 | RE: Forget close an open relation in ReorderBufferProcessTXN() |