From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Johansen <davejohansen(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Feike Steenbergen <feikesteenbergen(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Replication with partitions? |
Date: | 2015-12-08 17:46:51 |
Message-ID: | CAECtzeVhXpR7U7F3-X8gMBNRjk9g4==inUM+he3WA5_3rgFfSQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Le 8 déc. 2015 4:37 PM, "Dave Johansen" <davejohansen(at)gmail(dot)com> a écrit :
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:05 AM, Feike Steenbergen <
feikesteenbergen(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Dave,
>>
>> The built-in streaming replication of 9.2 gives you everything, you
cannot cherrypick which tables will be replicated and which one will not be
replicated.
>> Basically: The streaming replica will be an exact copy of you primary
cluster.
>>
>> So the answer to your question is no, it's not possible with the
streaming replication in 9.2.
>
>
> Does 9.3 or 9.4 support this sort of configuration?
Nope.
> If not, from the table in the documentation, it looks like Slony [1] and
Bucardo [2] would both work, so does any one have any recommendations?
>
Slony would be my choice because I know it pretty well. The same cannot be
said of bucardo.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Ribe | 2015-12-08 17:47:35 | Re: Replication with partitions? |
Previous Message | Yogi Barot | 2015-12-08 16:32:50 | Re: pg_upgrade error |