From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | sri harsha <sriharsha9992(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Information regarding Table-Locks |
Date: | 2015-01-16 05:52:18 |
Message-ID: | CAECtzeVB=nRS1x339Siiv7FEDvmyxHZsy3L3UdeYnBP3Nd3haA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Le 16 janv. 2015 06:27, "sri harsha" <sriharsha9992(at)gmail(dot)com> a écrit :
>
> Hi John.
>
> What if my query was INSERT INTO Postgres_Table_A SELECT * FROM
Postgres_Table_B ?? What are the locks given for the two tables ??
>
If they are both regular tables, they can insert at the same time. But you
can't rename a take while it's being read or written.
> --Harsha
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:50 AM, John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
wrote:
>>
>> On 1/15/2015 9:14 PM, sri harsha wrote:
>>>
>>> What kind of lock will the second table will be in ?
>>
>>
>> I suspect that depends on what FOREIGN_TABLE is connected to.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> john r pierce 37N 122W
>> somewhere on the middle of the left coast
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-01-16 05:52:34 | Re: can you have any idea about toast missing chunk issu resolution |
Previous Message | M Tarkeshwar Rao | 2015-01-16 05:38:35 | Re: can you have any idea about toast missing chunk issu resolution |