From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add parallel columns for pg_stat_statements |
Date: | 2024-11-07 13:33:07 |
Message-ID: | CAECtzeUq=hu2C1o=iXWUoF5HZ8affV5UcBsZJXZ=Kqu0LuqBYA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Le jeu. 7 nov. 2024 à 04:19, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> a écrit :
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 08:32:52AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Okay, applied 0001 and 0002 then after a second lookup. I'll spend
> > some more time thinking about 0003 and the other threads.
>
> Considered 0003, and I'm still not sure that this is something that
> is really required based on the correlation that are now possible with
> the number of times a query has been called and the number of
> planned/launched workers.
>
>
I'm fine with your decision. After using the new metrics, we'll probably
see more clearly if that's enough.
> So I am marking the entry as committed. Let's see about the threads
> for the addition of this data at table-level and at the
> database-level.
>
Sounds good!
Table level is probably not the most important in my view. Database-level
and logging are what really matters to me.
Thanks.
--
Guillaume.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nazir Bilal Yavuz | 2024-11-07 13:40:26 | Re: Adding NetBSD and OpenBSD to Postgres CI |
Previous Message | Vitaly Davydov | 2024-11-07 13:30:39 | Re: Slot's restart_lsn may point to removed WAL segment after hard restart unexpectedly |