From: | Kenneth Tilton <ktilton(at)mcna(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: efficient trigger function selection? |
Date: | 2012-04-11 18:18:33 |
Message-ID: | CAECCA8Zaka7dKqeqEB8w_u3fvJ-ZGOMOjcR=LsC=vwbJzSGuQA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 16:07 -0400, Kenneth Tilton wrote:
> > Suppose I have an RDF-style table (with columns for subject,
> > predicate, various object types, and graph) and want to have dozens or
> > even hundreds of trigger functions defined conditionally on the
> > predicate, ie "when predicate = '<your predicate here>'".
> >
> >
> > My guess is Postgres is quite efficient at determining which if any
> > trigger functions to call, but I thought I'd ask.
>
> I recommend measuring the overhead with some bogus no-op triggers; my
> guess is that it will be significant but maybe not too bad depending on
> what the rest of the application is doing.
>
> What are you trying to accomplish with so many triggers?
>
We are simulating a graph DB in Postgres and would have one RDF-like table
with columns as described above. If we want a trigger on what is
conventionally a column for "color", with pseudo-RDF we would have:
create trigger ... when predicate = 'color'
Since the graph data model reduces *everything *into so many RDF "triples",
almost every trigger function in the application would be "when predicate =
X".
well, let's see how many we really get before we panic. :)
Thx for the input.
-ken
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Nolan | 2012-04-11 19:09:53 | Fwd: [HACKERS] [streaming replication] 9.1.3 streaming replication bug ? |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-04-11 18:14:11 | Re: [GENERAL] [streaming replication] 9.1.3 streaming replication bug ? |