Re: Can a role have indirect ADMIN OPTION on another role?

From: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Can a role have indirect ADMIN OPTION on another role?
Date: 2023-09-07 07:32:26
Message-ID: CAE9k0Pnj_B9P9GE=136EqtcrF+QJnEHNst9nC7-mRfXKonAkBw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 3:43 AM David G. Johnston
<david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 1:55 PM Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> But what if roleB doesn't want to give roleA access to
>> the certain objects it owns.
>
>
> Not doable - roleA can always pretend they are roleB one way or another since roleA made roleB.
>

Okay. It makes sense. thanks.!

--
With Regards,
Ashutosh Sharma.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2023-09-07 07:37:08 Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows
Previous Message Ashutosh Sharma 2023-09-07 07:29:09 Re: Can a role have indirect ADMIN OPTION on another role?