| From: | Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Prabhat Sahu <prabhat(dot)sahu(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: tableam vs. TOAST |
| Date: | 2019-11-11 07:30:00 |
| Message-ID: | CAE9k0PmqKnFR68axmpq0MZ2GTKPe+bhX3ApMuqq8UYD4egAUFQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Craig,
Please find my response inline below.
On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 2:39 PM Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 at 22:45, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>
> In fact, I suspect this is PostgreSQL successfully protecting itself from an unsafe situation.
>
> Does the host have thin-provisioned storage? lvmthin, thin-provisioned SAN, etc?
>
No, It doesn't. Infact the machine on which the issue was reproduced
once/twice doesn't have any LVMs. The other machine on which the issue
never got reproduced have some LVMs but they are thick-provisioned not
thin-provisioned.
> Is the DB on NFS?
>
No.
--
With Regards,
Ashutosh Sharma
EnterpriseDB:http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2019-11-11 07:35:22 | Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum |
| Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2019-11-11 07:29:09 | Re: cost based vacuum (parallel) |