Re: Multi-Column List Partitioning

From: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Multi-Column List Partitioning
Date: 2021-12-21 05:46:51
Message-ID: CAE9k0PkrDv+YMRD9DmZBRwG1r51pV-a6kFiUyLaRZ-EvX6QQ9Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 7:04 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 11:37 PM Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is this okay?
> >
> > postgres=# CREATE TABLE t1 (a int, b int) PARTITION BY LIST ( a, a, a );
> > CREATE TABLE
> >
> > postgres=# CREATE TABLE t1_1 PARTITION OF t1 FOR VALUES IN ((1, 2, 3),
> (4, 5, 6));
> > CREATE TABLE
> >
> > postgres=# \d t1
> > Partitioned table "public.t1"
> > Column | Type | Collation | Nullable | Default
> > --------+---------+-----------+----------+---------
> > a | integer | | |
> > b | integer | | |
> > Partition key: LIST (a, a, a)
> > Number of partitions: 1 (Use \d+ to list them.)
>
> I'd say it's not okay for a user to expect this to work sensibly, and
> I don't think it would be worthwhile to write code to point that out
> to the user if that is what you were implying.
>

OK. As you wish.

--
With Regards,
Ashutosh Sharma.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2021-12-21 05:53:37 Re: parallel vacuum comments
Previous Message Ashutosh Sharma 2021-12-21 05:40:17 Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints