From: | Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Test-cases for deferred constraints in plpgsql_transaction.sql |
Date: | 2018-07-02 15:11:26 |
Message-ID: | CAE9k0P=xJpXsJ231Mt8MoPPmD5ndxK_DEQROHHAoTNzHUwgB0g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 7:07 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 3:30 PM, Peter Eisentraut
>> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I won't say we don't need more tests, but I don't see a particular
>>> testing gap in this area.
>
>> I am not saying that the existing test-case is not enough to test
>> deferred constraints but, it would have been good to add test-cases
>> having ROLLBACK statements with deferred constraints as well.
>
> What exactly would that test, other than that ROLLBACK discards changes?
> Which is a point that seems to me to be pretty well covered already.
>
Firstly, it would test if the ROLLBACK works as expected when used
with the deferred constraints in plpgsql procedures. Secondly, it
would test if the COMMIT/ROLLBACK works as expected for deferrable
constraints which was initially immediate type but, later it got set
to deferred using SET CONSTRAINTS command. I just raised this point
because i couldn't find such test anywhere in plpgsl_transaction.sql
file. Please let me know if i am missing something here. Thanks.
--
With Regards,
Ashutosh Sharma
EnterpriseDB:http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Gierth | 2018-07-02 15:15:56 | Re: Should contrib modules install .h files? |
Previous Message | Andrew Gierth | 2018-07-02 15:11:07 | Re: Should contrib modules install .h files? |