Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 5:02 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

+/* ----------
+ * RelFileNumber zero is InvalidRelFileNumber.
+ *
+ * For the system tables (OID < FirstNormalObjectId) the initial storage

Above comment says that RelFileNumber zero is invalid which is technically
correct because we don't have any relation file in disk with zero number.
But the point is that if someone reads below definition of
CHECK_RELFILENUMBER_RANGE he/she might get confused because as per this
definition relfilenumber zero is valid.

+#define CHECK_RELFILENUMBER_RANGE(relfilenumber) \
+do { \
+ if ((relfilenumber) < 0 || (relfilenumber) > MAX_RELFILENUMBER) \
+ ereport(ERROR, \
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), \
+ errmsg("relfilenumber " INT64_FORMAT " is out of range",
\
+ (relfilenumber)))); \
+} while (0)
+

+ RelFileNumber relfilenumber = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
+ CHECK_RELFILENUMBER_RANGE(relfilenumber);

It seems like the relfilenumber in above definition represents relfilenode
value in pg_class which can hold zero value which actually means it's a
mapped relation. I think it would be good to provide some clarity here.

--
With Regards,
Ashutosh Sharma.