From: | Herbey Eric Zepeda <ehzepeda(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Sequences vs statistics |
Date: | 2013-10-29 03:16:47 |
Message-ID: | CAE7DxbZ4oXo7S4g_QpYNX3U1WhD2hQBXVqa6HZPa6oud8OvwFw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Hi, I'm in the process of deciding whether to use.
-1 sequence per table containing the number of rows
-Using the collected statistics and functions like pg_relation_size
This is my use case:
I have several hundred tables in one database that I would like to
constantly monitor as far as size or number of records.
When a certain threshold is met, I will not allow any further inserts
into that table.
The threshold-met-event can be approximate.
How will I affect the performance of the server if I chose to query
for the system statistics data say, every 5 seconds as opposed to
just reading the latest_value of a sequence that gets updated every time
a row is added to its corresponding table?
Thank you
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Johnston | 2013-10-29 03:56:29 | Re: Sequences vs statistics |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-10-28 22:59:11 | Re: displaying UTC time in local time |