From: | Pantelis Theodosiou <ypercube(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nico Williams <nico(at)cryptonector(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Make subquery alias optional in FROM clause |
Date: | 2017-02-23 10:38:20 |
Message-ID: | CAE3TBxzq=QWg37bW6qHByJpO-5x0_t4oomogjgxmE2m9uynf_w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 3:17 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Nico Williams <nico(at)cryptonector(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >> I suspect most users, like me, just roll their eyes, grumble, and put up
> >> with it rather than complain. It's a pain point, but tolerable enough
> >> that no one bothers to demand a change. Now that it's been done though,
> >> allow me to add my voice in favor of it!
>
> > +1 to all of that.
My vote doesn't count much but it would be -1.
Question: Will the patch be removed if and when Oracle decides to be
compatible with the standard and forbids non-aliased derived tables?
(I know it's a rather theoretical question. Unlikely that Oracle breaks
backwards compatibility on that.)
Pantelis Theodosiou
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2017-02-23 11:17:31 | proposal - psql: possibility to specify sort for describe commands, when size is printed |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2017-02-23 10:32:55 | Re: UPDATE of partition key |