From: | Pantelis Theodosiou <ypercube(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | muhammadxonnajimov(at)outlook(dot)com, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #17357: When working with the window_function, the Where Clause does not work properly! |
Date: | 2022-01-07 11:39:18 |
Message-ID: | CAE3TBxxV6-pSB-F6Js+FLOVc4s0=5OfoW0qLeK-yASGAtCMD5w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 11:06 AM PG Bug reporting form <
noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 17357
> Logged by: Muhammadxon Najimov
> Email address: muhammadxonnajimov(at)outlook(dot)com
> PostgreSQL version: 14.1
> Operating system: Fedora 35 (Workstation Edition)
> Description:
>
> Hi,
>
> 1. I created table like this:
>
> create table elements (
> id serial primary key,
> priority smallint default 0
> );
> // CREATE TABLE [OK]
>
> 2. And insterted some rows:
> insert into elements (priority) values
> (1), (2), (3), (0), (0),
> (3), (2), (1), (0), (0),
> (0), (0), (0), (0), (0),
> (1), (1), (2), (2), (3)
> ;
> // INSERT 0 20 [OK]
>
> 3. Wrote Query
> select
> *,
> row_number() over(
> partition by priority order by priority desc
> ) as n
> from elements
> ;
>
> 4. and the result was as follows:
> // (20 rows) [OK]
>
> All is well. then I took the result to a virtual table:
> select *
> from (
> select
> *,
> row_number() over(
> partition by priority order by priority desc
> ) as n
> from elements
> ) as tmp
> ;
>
> // (20 rows) [OK]
>
> The result is the same, but here WHERE clause is not working properly:
> select *
> from (
> select
> *,
> row_number() over(
> partition by priority order by priority desc
> ) as n
> from elements
> ) as tmp
> WHERE n = 1 AND priority = 3
> ;
>
> Is that logical?
> if you look at the picture above, the id number of the record with n = 1
> and
> pr = 3 is not 3. Ok priority equals to 3 but n not equals 1.
>
This is not a bug.
Your ORDER BY inside the window function is not deterministic:
over(
partition by priority order by priority desc
)
The rows with same priority are ordered based on the (same) priority value
so the optimizer is free to choose any order to assign row numbers. In one
query it chooses to some order, in the second it chooses a different one.
Try using a deterministic ordering and you'll get consistent results, eg:
over(
partition by priority order by id desc
)
or
over(
partition by priority order by id
)
Best regards
Pantelis Theodosiou
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-01-07 20:48:52 | Re: BUG #17358: While using --with-uuid=bsd option, uuid_ossp test fails on NetBSD 9.2 |
Previous Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2022-01-07 10:38:50 | BUG #17358: While using --with-uuid=bsd option, uuid_ossp test fails on NetBSD 9.2 |