Re: rangesel() bugs on basic comparison operators with an empty range

From:	Emre Hasegeli <emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com>
To:	Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc:	pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:	Re: rangesel() bugs on basic comparison operators with an empty range
Date:	2015-01-30 15:17:06
Message-ID:	CAE2gYzz0Ec8TBs7Xw3oYF5gRPk5XvcLSs=2WLPE1kqbc68VCiA@mail.gmail.com
Views:	Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2015-01-30 14:31:52 from Emre Hasegeli <emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com> 📎  2015-01-30 14:39:36 from Emre Hasegeli <emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com>   2015-01-30 15:03:57 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>    2015-01-30 15:17:06 from Emre Hasegeli <emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com> 📎     2015-01-30 17:32:03 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Lists:	pgsql-bugs

Attachment	Content-Type	Size
rangesel-empty-fix-v2.patch	application/octet-stream	7.6 KB

In response to

• Re: rangesel() bugs on basic comparison operators with an empty range at 2015-01-30 15:03:57 from Tom Lane

Responses

• Re: rangesel() bugs on basic comparison operators with an empty range at 2015-01-30 17:32:03 from Tom Lane

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Heikki Linnakangas	2015-01-30 17:18:20	Re: BUG #12694: crash if the number of result rows is lower than gin_fuzzy_search_limit
Previous Message	Tom Lane	2015-01-30 15:03:57	Re: rangesel() bugs on basic comparison operators with an empty range