Re: Shouldn't "WHEN (OLD.* IS DISTINCT FROM NEW.*)" clause be independent from data type?

From: Emre Hasegeli <emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, "pinker *EXTERN*" <pinker(at)onet(dot)eu>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Shouldn't "WHEN (OLD.* IS DISTINCT FROM NEW.*)" clause be independent from data type?
Date: 2015-10-04 09:16:22
Message-ID: CAE2gYzyspOyDBwoYpxR8+DN82jkUfRX=D7rb9_WrezEtmbWgng@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> The other line of attack would be to deprecate all the fuzzy comparison
> behavior in the geometric types, and just make it exact. Don't know how
> much pain that would add, but surely it would also subtract some.

How can we go forward about this? The current state of the operators
stand in the way of improving index support for them.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paolo De Michele 2015-10-04 09:45:12 Re: postgresql doesn't start
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2015-10-03 22:30:53 Re: Replication with 9.4