From: | Emre Hasegeli <emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvaro(dot)herrera(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: best place for "rtree" strategy numbers |
Date: | 2015-05-25 10:04:18 |
Message-ID: | CAE2gYzw6idUzpzmqWrPps3N83+AmU=PB+HWb0rgi-ovpSFNKDQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Adjacent strategy number of range types don't match the central
definitions. Attached patch changes it.
Also, maybe it is better to include stratnum.h on rangetypes.h and
inet.h rather than the .c files as the definitions are used in the
headers. I wouldn't re-define them, anyway. Two definitions just to
say 3 is too much for my taste.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
change-range-adjacent-strategy-number.patch | application/octet-stream | 6.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2015-05-25 10:35:40 | Re: Missing importing option of postgres_fdw |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2015-05-25 09:38:51 | Update README.tuplock? |