From: | Liming Hu <dawninghu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: request a new feature in fuzzystrmatch |
Date: | 2013-05-17 16:40:27 |
Message-ID: | CAE-MfPumsY8fELsPOLU18=7vgQDgF6mm5aDTFoOHaCYKUTpsSA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Actually it is easy for me to just modify the code, and use it for me
case, I would like to contribute to the
community. I will write a basic implementation first.
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Liming Hu escribió:
>>> Hi Atri,
>>>
>>> I also talked to the author of fuzzystrmatch, he also thinks it is a
>>> good feature.
>>
>> Yeah, I heard our fuzzystrmatch module being talked down a decade ago
>> for not considering transpositions, so +1 for getting it patched.
>>
>
> That is awesome then. The example Liming provided is itself pretty
> interesting and promising.
>
> Regards,
>
> Atri
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Atri
> l'apprenant
--
Liming Hu
cell: (435)-512-4190
Seattle Washington
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2013-05-17 18:07:32 | Re: counting algorithm for incremental matview maintenance |
Previous Message | Atri Sharma | 2013-05-17 16:10:32 | Re: request a new feature in fuzzystrmatch |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2013-05-17 19:06:06 | Re: request a new feature in fuzzystrmatch |
Previous Message | Atri Sharma | 2013-05-17 16:10:32 | Re: request a new feature in fuzzystrmatch |