Re: request a new feature in fuzzystrmatch

From: Liming Hu <dawninghu(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Subject: Re: request a new feature in fuzzystrmatch
Date: 2013-05-17 16:40:27
Message-ID: CAE-MfPumsY8fELsPOLU18=7vgQDgF6mm5aDTFoOHaCYKUTpsSA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

Actually it is easy for me to just modify the code, and use it for me
case, I would like to contribute to the
community. I will write a basic implementation first.

On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Liming Hu escribió:
>>> Hi Atri,
>>>
>>> I also talked to the author of fuzzystrmatch, he also thinks it is a
>>> good feature.
>>
>> Yeah, I heard our fuzzystrmatch module being talked down a decade ago
>> for not considering transpositions, so +1 for getting it patched.
>>
>
> That is awesome then. The example Liming provided is itself pretty
> interesting and promising.
>
> Regards,
>
> Atri
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Atri
> l'apprenant

--
Liming Hu
cell: (435)-512-4190
Seattle Washington

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2013-05-17 18:07:32 Re: counting algorithm for incremental matview maintenance
Previous Message Atri Sharma 2013-05-17 16:10:32 Re: request a new feature in fuzzystrmatch

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2013-05-17 19:06:06 Re: request a new feature in fuzzystrmatch
Previous Message Atri Sharma 2013-05-17 16:10:32 Re: request a new feature in fuzzystrmatch