Re: Parallel Seq Scan vs kernel read ahead

From: Soumyadeep Chakraborty <soumyadeep2007(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel Seq Scan vs kernel read ahead
Date: 2020-06-03 23:21:57
Message-ID: CAE-ML+-5=4n=001o9D8JOtyygS=H1wsWgs90F_6F4o_TzHAQPg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 3:18 PM Soumyadeep Chakraborty
<soumyadeep2007(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Idk if that is a lesser evil than the workers
> being idle..probably not?

Apologies, I meant that the extra atomic fetches is probably a lesser
evil than the workers being idle.

Soumyadeep

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chapman Flack 2020-06-03 23:57:16 Re: what can go in root.crt ?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-06-03 22:41:28 Re: libpq copy error handling busted