Re: [pgAdmin4][Patch]: RM #1978 - Add an option to allow user to disable alertifyjs and acitree animations

From: Joao De Almeida Pereira <jdealmeidapereira(at)pivotal(dot)io>
To: Khushboo Vashi <khushboo(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgAdmin4][Patch]: RM #1978 - Add an option to allow user to disable alertifyjs and acitree animations
Date: 2018-03-29 15:16:36
Message-ID: CAE+jjamViJ=nF9PK+Yyvk8+yTMwQ5VMoeq=gTGnfE-Qo1ek=fg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Hi Khushboo,

The patch looks like it is heading on the correct direction, we passed it
through our test pipeline and all tests passed.

We found the same issues as Dave mentioned in his email, also after some
code review we have the following questions/comments:

. Why does modify_animation.js have a dependency on sources/pgadmin if it
doesnt use it?
. Can we convert modify_animation.js to ES6 without requirejs?
. Why does modifyAnimation function have 2 arguments if we never use the
second one?
. Can we convert modify_animation_spec.js to ES6 without requirejs?
. Why is pgBrowser.tree.options function called 4 times in the tests?
As an aside, when you use toHaveBeenCalledWith it is redundant to expect
on toHaveBeenCalled
. Looks like we are missing some coverage of the alertify modification as
well

As an aside get_preferences, the "cache", is still broken, if the cache as
no value it will retrieve it but returns undefined to the caller. This
behavior need to be addressed. We should change get preferences to be a
Promise based thing or else this might become a problem....

As another aside, one of our goals should be to move away from requirejs
into a full ES6, webpack javascript build. In order to do that we should
try to write the least amount of code possible using requirejs syntax. If
we really need to write something in requirejs let it be a wrapper that
call our ES6 function/class

Thanks
Joao

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 9:25 AM Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:

> Hi
>
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 1:51 PM, Khushboo Vashi <
> khushboo(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 6:07 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 7:23 AM, Khushboo Vashi <
>>> khushboo(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Please find the attached patch to fix RM #1978: Add an option to allow
>>>> user to disable alertifyjs and acitree animations.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I think these really need to be per-user settings, not
>>> per-installation.. Whether or not animations are shown is really a matter
>>> of personal taste and circumstance.
>>>
>>> Right, it should be per-user settings. Please find the attached updated
>> patch.
>>
>
> I found some issues I'm afraid:
>
> - The label "Enable dialogues/notifications animation?" should read
> "Enable dialogue/notification animation?"
>
> - Disabling treeview animation only seems to affect the main browser
> treeview, and not others in the application (e.g. the one on the
> Preferences panel).
>
> - After disabling dialogue/notification animations, I cannot re-enable
> notification animations. If I flip the switch back on, dialogue animations
> immediately start working again, but notification animations don't even
> work following a reload.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joao De Almeida Pereira 2018-03-29 15:27:32 Re: [pgAdmin4][RM#3155] Allow user to lock the Layout
Previous Message Dave Page 2018-03-29 13:47:55 Re: [pgAdmin4][RM#3155] Allow user to lock the Layout