Re: [pgAdmin4][Patch][RM_2400]: Columns with defaults set to NULL when removing contents after pasting in the edit grid

From: Joao Pedro De Almeida Pereira <jdealmeidapereira(at)pivotal(dot)io>
To: Surinder Kumar <surinder(dot)kumar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Shruti B Iyer <siyer(at)pivotal(dot)io>
Subject: Re: [pgAdmin4][Patch][RM_2400]: Columns with defaults set to NULL when removing contents after pasting in the edit grid
Date: 2017-05-18 14:06:47
Message-ID: CAE+jja=ySYPa-Wt_qpo=o+iQA+m7B+8gJKWdjuED+S3dbUkPgw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Hello Hackers,

We reviewed the PR, and there are a lot of new lines of code in this patch,
are we sure that we can have a good coverage of the functionality just by
doing feature tests?
Adding more code to a 3.5k+ lines file doesn't look like a good option, do
you think it is possible to extract some of the functionality to their own
files and have test around those functionalities?

Do we really need to have an epicRandomString function in our code? Would
it be better to use a library that would provide us that functionality out
of the box?
The functions this.applyValue in slick.pgadmin.editors.js that were change
in this patch are exactly the same, can we extract that code into a single
function instead of repeating the code?

Using feature tests is a good option to ensure that the integration of all
the components of the application is working as expected, but in order to
tests behaviors that are edge cases the Unit Tests are much cheaper to run
and create.

Thanks
Joao & Shruti

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 1:22 AM, Surinder Kumar <
surinder(dot)kumar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

> Hi Dave,
>
> Please review the updated patch.
>
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 8:46 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Surinder Kumar <
>> surinder(dot)kumar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Dave,
>>>
>>> *Implementation:*
>>>
>>> 1) Took a flag 'is_row_copied' for each copied row:
>>>
>>> - to distinguish it from add/update row.
>>> - to write code specific to copied row only as it requires different
>>> logic than add row.
>>>
>>> 2) After pasting an existing row:
>>>
>>> - If a user clear the cell value, it must set cell to [default] value
>>> if default value is explicitly given for column while creating table
>>> otherwise [null].
>>>
>>> - Again, if a user entered a value in same cell, then removes that
>>> value, set it to [null] (the same behaviour is for add row).
>>>
>>> 3) Took a 2-dimensional array "grid.copied_rows" to keep track the
>>> changes of each row's cell so that changes made to each cell are
>>> independent and removed once data is saved.
>>>
>>> 4) On pasting a row, the cell must be highlighted with light green
>>> colour, so triggers an addNewRow event. Now copied row will add to grid
>>> instead of re-rendering all rows again.
>>>
>>> 5) Moved the common logic into functions.
>>>
>>> This patch pass the feature test cases and jasmine test case.
>>> Also I will add the test cases for copy row and send an updated patch.
>>>
>>> Please find attached patch and review.
>>>
>>
>> Looks good. I saw the following issues:
>>
>> - The "new" row is not available once I've created the first new row, or
>> pasted some.
>>
> ​Fixed.
>
>>
>> - Rows are pasted in reverse order.
>>
> ​Fixed.
>
>>
>> - If I copy/paste a new row that has yet to be saved, none of the values
>> are actually copied.
>>
> ​Fixed.​
>
>>
>> - Attempting to save a row that contains all null/default values results
>> in an invalid query:
>>
>> INSERT INTO public.defaults (
>> ) VALUES (
>> );
>>
>> I think the only answer here is to explicitly insert NULL into any
>> columns *without* a default value.
>>
> ​I could not reproduce, However #3 might have fixed it too.​
>
> Apart from this, I noticed epicRandomString(...) function doesn't generate
> unique number always, due to this save and delete rows was affected. Not
> all rows saved or deleted. The new function always returns a unique random
> number.
> Fixed.
>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> --
>> Dave Page
>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>
>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joao Pedro De Almeida Pereira 2017-05-18 14:27:40 Re: Fix for RM2421 [pgAdmin4][patch]
Previous Message Dave Page 2017-05-18 13:42:07 Re: [patch] upgrade slickgrid