Re: [patch] Dependents and Dependencies in GreenPlum

From: Joao Pedro De Almeida Pereira <jdealmeidapereira(at)pivotal(dot)io>
To: Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [patch] Dependents and Dependencies in GreenPlum
Date: 2017-04-26 15:22:33
Message-ID: CAE+jja=8s-x82BVuBD4THq5V=07F_rJn0+Sa8vUGc=rOtxwWLA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Hello Ashesh,

Thanks for reviewing the patch.

We added the __init__.py files into templates to convert them into packages
so that the tests inside of them can be found by the test runner.

Thanks!
Joao & Sarah

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 1:26 AM, Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>
>> Ashesh, can you review/commit this please?
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 8:42 PM, Joao Pedro De Almeida Pereira <
>> jdealmeidapereira(at)pivotal(dot)io> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Hackers,
>>>
>>> We found out that when you are connected to a GreenPlum database and try
>>> to get Dependents and Dependencies of an object the application was
>>> returning a SQL error.
>>>
>>> This patch splits the SQL query used to retrieve the Dependents,
>>> Dependencies, and Roles SQL file into multiple versioned files.
>>> Add Unit Tests for each file.
>>> Also added __init__.py files to other test directories to run the tests
>>> in them.
>>>
>> Hi Joao & Sarah,
>
> Why do we need to add __init__.py in the template directory?
> I didn't understand the purpose of the adding __init__.py files in the
> template directories.
>
> NOTE: The headers in those files are not consistent with the other project
> files.
>
> --
>
> Thanks & Regards,
>
> Ashesh Vashi
> EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
> <http://www.enterprisedb.com/>
>
>
> *http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi*
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi>
>
>> Add ORDER BY into Copy Selection Feature test to ensure the results are
>>> retrieved always in the same order
>>> Renamed the Scenario of the xss_checks_pgadmin_debugger_test and skip
>>> it for versions less than 9.1
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Joao & Sarah
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>>> To make changes to your subscription:
>>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dave Page
>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>
>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shirley Wang 2017-04-26 15:45:12 Re: [Design update] Style guide for pgAdmin4
Previous Message Joao Pedro De Almeida Pereira 2017-04-26 15:16:58 Re: [pgAdmin4][Patch]: Fixed RM #2315 : Sorting by size is broken