Re: feature freeze and beta schedule

From: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: feature freeze and beta schedule
Date: 2015-05-02 08:15:41
Message-ID: CADyhKSX-Qg9=EjNJxhVWg8zmPeFixg6g3xT_C7DwpEb01mqdFg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2015-05-02 1:37 GMT+09:00 Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>:
> * ctidscan as an example of custom-scan
> Hasn't really gotten sufficient review.
> => Move
>
I have to agree.

> * Join pushdown support for foreign tables
> Hasn't gotten particularly much review yet. And it doesn't look
> entirely ready to me on a very quick scan. But I don't know that much
> about the area.
> => Move?
>
I think its overall design had been discussed and people reached
consensus. Even though some documentation / comments works
are required, it is not a fundamental design change isn't it?
I expect the join-pushdown of postgres_fdw will reach the commitable
state within two weeks.

Thanks,
--
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2015-05-02 12:53:11 Re: Rounding to even for numeric data type
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-05-02 04:40:00 Re: procost for to_tsvector