Re: [v9.3] Row-Level Security

2012/12/3 David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 03:20:28PM +0100, Kohei KaiGai wrote:
>> > However, UPDATE / DELETE support is not perfect right now.
>> > In case when we try to update / delete a table with inherited
>> > children and RETURNING clause was added, is loses right
>> > references to the pseudo columns, even though it works fine
>> > without inherited children.
>> >
>> The attached patch fixed this known problem.
>
> This patch no longer applies to git master. Any chance of a rebase?
>
OK, I'll rebese it.

> Also, might this approach work for the catalog? The use case I have
> in mind is multi-tenancy, although one can imagine organizations where
> internal access controls might be required on it, too.
>
If you intend to control behavior of DDL commands that internally takes
access towards system catalog, RLS feature is not helpful.
Please use sepgsql instead. :-)
If you intend to control DML commands towards system catalogs, here
is nothing special, so I expect it works as we are doing at user tables.

Thanks,
--
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>