Re: FDW for PostgreSQL

From: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
To: Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FDW for PostgreSQL
Date: 2012-11-28 11:04:38
Message-ID: CADyhKSW1_bx58CvedRHx3CJ1OOm7u9daJbw_Eg-HbpD-oh4S-Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2012/11/28 Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>:
> it is reasonable. So, "postgre_fdw" is OK for me. "pgsql_fdw" is also welcome.
>
Sorry, s/"postgre_fdw"/"postgres_fdw"/g

Thanks,
--
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2012-11-28 12:59:06 Re: Bugs in CREATE/DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY
Previous Message Kohei KaiGai 2012-11-28 11:03:11 Re: FDW for PostgreSQL