From: | Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [sepgsql 1/3] add name qualified creation label |
Date: | 2013-01-24 09:11:34 |
Message-ID: | CADyhKSV_PwT00MnUjTsmks9rptnNeK+FLYhwY=NchZO+O3hzLw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2013/1/24 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> writes:
>> On 1/23/2013 8:32 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> FWIW, in Fedora-land I see: ...
>
>> I'd be far more interested in what is in RHEL and CentOS. Fedora,
>> with its 6 month obsolescence cycle, is of zero interest to me for
>> deploying database servers.
>
> But of course Fedora is also the upstream that will become RHEL7
> and beyond.
>
>> EL6 has libselinux 2.0.94
>> EL5 has libselinux 1.33.4
>
> sepgsql already requires libselinux 2.0.99, so it doesn't appear to me
> that moving that goalpost is going to change things one way or the other
> for the existing RHEL branches. I couldn't ship contrib/sepgsql today
> in those branches.
>
> It might be that the update timing makes a bigger difference in some
> other distros, though. To return to Heikki's original point about
> Debian, what are they shipping today?
>
Even though I'm not good at release cycle of Debian, I tried to check
the shipped version of postgresql and libselinux for stable, testing,
unstable and experimental release.
I'm not certain why they don't push postgresql-9.2 into experimental
release yet. However, it seems to me optimistic libselinux-2.1.10 being
bundled on the timeline of postgresql-9.3.
If someone familiar with Debian's release cycle, I'd like to see the suggestion.
* Debian (stable) ... postgresql-8.4 + libselinux-2.0.96
http://packages.debian.org/en/squeeze/postgresql
http://packages.debian.org/en/source/squeeze/libselinux
* Debian (testing) ... postgresql-9.1 + libselinux-2.1.9
http://packages.debian.org/en/wheezy/postgresql
http://packages.debian.org/en/source/wheezy/libselinux
* Debian (unstable) ... postgresql-9.1 + libselinux-2.1.9
http://packages.debian.org/en/sid/postgresql
http://packages.debian.org/en/source/sid/libselinux
* Debian (experimental) ... postgresql-9.1 + libselinux-2.1.12
http://packages.debian.org/en/experimental/postgresql
http://packages.debian.org/en/source/experimental/libselinux
Also, Ubuntu almost reflects Debian's release.
* Ubuntu 11.10 ... postgresql-9.1 + libselinux-2.0.98
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/oneiric/+package/postgresql
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/oneiric/+source/libselinux
* Ubuntu 12.04 ... postgresql-9.1 + libselinux-2.1.0
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+package/postgresql
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/libselinux
* Ubuntu 12.10 ... postgresql-9.1 + libselinux-2.1.9
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/quantal/+package/postgresql
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/quantal/+source/libselinux
Thanks,
--
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2013-01-24 09:13:39 | Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution) |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2013-01-24 09:09:51 | Re: logical changeset generation v4 - Heikki's thoughts about the patch state |