From: | Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: recent ALTER whatever .. SET SCHEMA refactoring |
Date: | 2013-01-15 14:48:47 |
Message-ID: | CADyhKSVOi8oZ-9O1F=FGKiE=RzFKTymSNUGq9nDWEAH-z48Seg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2013/1/15 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:
> Alvaro Herrera escribió:
>> Kohei KaiGai escribió:
>>
>> > I'm probably saying same idea. It just adds invocation of external
>> > functions to check naming conflicts of functions or collation; that
>> > takes additional 4-lines for special case handling
>> > in AlterObjectNamespace_internal().
>>
>> Okay, I can agree with this implementation plan.
>
> Actually, now that I look again, this is all completely broken, because
> the "object already exists in schema foo" message is using
> getObjectDescription infrastructure, which we agree to be completely
> wrong.
>
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CADyhKSWVqaA6iF5wVuW5EzLaiYyCYEE2zO9guqNKy8FRdLx5Gw@mail.gmail.com
Does this patch help the trouble?
It adds ereport_on_namespace_conflict() for error message generation instead of
getObjectDescription() for ALTER RENAME primarily, but I also noticed it can be
applied on getObjectDescription() of AlterObjectNamespace_internal.
Thanks,
--
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Claudio Freire | 2013-01-15 14:55:31 | Re: [PATCH] COPY .. COMPRESSED |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2013-01-15 14:43:04 | Re: strange OOM errors with EXECUTE in PL/pgSQL |