Re: [sepgsql 1/3] add name qualified creation label

2013/1/24 Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> wrote:
>> 2013/1/24 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
>>> John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> writes:
>>>> On 1/23/2013 8:32 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>>> FWIW, in Fedora-land I see: ...
>>>
>>>> I'd be far more interested in what is in RHEL and CentOS. Fedora,
>>>> with its 6 month obsolescence cycle, is of zero interest to me for
>>>> deploying database servers.
>>>
>>> But of course Fedora is also the upstream that will become RHEL7
>>> and beyond.
>
> Do we know which version of Fedora will become RHEL7, and thus, which
> version of libselinux will go in RHEL7? (And do we know which version
> of postgres will go in RHEL7, assuming release schedules hold)
>
I'm not certain...

>>> It might be that the update timing makes a bigger difference in some
>>> other distros, though. To return to Heikki's original point about
>>> Debian, what are they shipping today?
>>>
>> Even though I'm not good at release cycle of Debian, I tried to check
>> the shipped version of postgresql and libselinux for stable, testing,
>> unstable and experimental release.
>> I'm not certain why they don't push postgresql-9.2 into experimental
>> release yet. However, it seems to me optimistic libselinux-2.1.10 being
>> bundled on the timeline of postgresql-9.3.
>>
>> If someone familiar with Debian's release cycle, I'd like to see the suggestion.
>>
>> * Debian (stable) ... postgresql-8.4 + libselinux-2.0.96
>> http://packages.debian.org/en/squeeze/postgresql
>> http://packages.debian.org/en/source/squeeze/libselinux
>>
>> * Debian (testing) ... postgresql-9.1 + libselinux-2.1.9
>> http://packages.debian.org/en/wheezy/postgresql
>> http://packages.debian.org/en/source/wheezy/libselinux
>
> Just as a note, wheezy is the version that will be the next debian
> stable, and it's in freeze since quite a while back. So we can safely
> expect it will be 2.1.9 that's included in the next debian stable.
>
It seems to me this means pgsql-9.1 shall be bundled with
libselinux-2.1.9, but not pgsql-9.3, so here is no matter.

When pgsql-9.3 is released, Fedora 17 will exceed end-of-life.
Debian already releases libselinux-2.1.12 on experimental package
even though its pgsql is 9.1. Is it too optimistic estimation?

Thanks,
--
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>