| From: | Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs |
| Date: | 2013-02-07 07:29:38 |
| Message-ID: | CADxJZo1dyOgYs=mmk46fp6QGKCy7WFeTn0E2x6bBivizP2znwA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On 7 February 2013 08:07, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> The existing Gerrit community would be keen to have the PostgreSQL
> project as a major user, though, and would theoretically help with
> modification needs. Current major users are OpenStack, Mediawiki,
> LibreOffice and QT.
Do we actually have any requirements that are known to be uncatered
for in gerrit's standard feature set?
Cheers,
BJ
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2013-02-07 07:37:06 | Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs |
| Previous Message | Miroslav Šimulčík | 2013-02-07 07:29:35 | Re: [HACKERS] function for setting/getting same timestamp during whole transaction |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2013-02-07 07:37:06 | Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs |
| Previous Message | Daniel Farina | 2013-02-07 07:20:23 | Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs |