From: | Mitsumasa KONDO <kondo(dot)mitsumasa(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: gaussian distribution pgbench -- splits v4 |
Date: | 2014-07-31 01:00:29 |
Message-ID: | CADupcHXqvBS+fbCc=7Mwu4JBfNZebhLEAkrCxXuNkgo01TsFhA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
2014-07-31 5:18 GMT+09:00 Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>:
>
> I've committed the changes to pgbench.c and the documentation changes
>> with some further wordsmithing.
>>
>
> Ok, thanks a lot for your reviews and your help with improving the
> documentation.
Yeah, thanks for all relative members.
> I don't think including the other changes in patch A is a good idea,
>>
>
> Fine. It was mostly for testing and checking purposes.
Hmm... It doesn't have harm for pgbench source code. And, in general,
checking script is useful for avoiding bug.
nor am I in favor of patch B.
>>
>
> Yep.
No, patch B is still needed. Please tell me the reason. I don't like
deciding by someones feeling,
and it needs logical reason. Our documentation is better than the past. I
think it can easy to understand decile probability.
This part of the discussion is needed to continue...
Would providing these as additional contrib files be more acceptable?
> Something like "tpc-b-gauss.sql"... Otherwise there is no example available
> to show the feature.
>
I agree the test script and including command line options. It's not harm,
and it's useful.
Best regards,
--
Mitsumasa KONDO
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2014-07-31 01:54:37 | Re: New developer TODO suggestions |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-07-30 23:26:45 | Re: Proposal to add a QNX 6.5 port to PostgreSQL |