From: | Purav Chovatia <puravc(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Shital A <brightuser2019(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PSQL performance - TPS |
Date: | 2019-08-01 18:06:33 |
Message-ID: | CADrzpjG-JpxHVBZDYB_qtZyxmOPu_H=J1oirmyCdzAqp+RMi5g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
I am not very surprised with these results. However, what’s the disk type?
That can matter quite a bit.
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 at 10:51 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2019-08-01 08:40:53 +0530, Shital A wrote:
> > Need help in:
> > 1. On this env(8core cpu, 16GB) what is the TPS that we can expect? We
> have
> > tested with a simple Java code firing insert and commit in a loop on a
> > simple table with one column. We get 1200 rows per sec. If we increase
> > threads RPS decrease.
> >
> > 2. We have tuned some DB params like shared_buffers, sync_commit off, are
> > there any other pointers to tune DB params?
>
> If you've set synchronous_commit = off, and you still get only 1200
> transactions/sec, something else is off. Are you sure you set that?
>
> Are your clients in the same datacenter as your database? Otherwise it
> could be that you're mostly seeing latency effects.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Andres Freund
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2019-08-01 18:14:58 | Re: PSQL performance - TPS |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2019-08-01 17:21:28 | Re: PSQL performance - TPS |