From: | Sameer Kumar <sameer(dot)kumar(at)ashnik(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | mfatticcioni(at)mbigroup(dot)it |
Cc: | PostgreSQL General Discussion Forum <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: High Availability Cluster |
Date: | 2014-12-04 04:14:22 |
Message-ID: | CADp-Sm5cCNBs52sikdz1qeXtqJiBXPC3ETpf=GUChrnk8pTZHA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Maila Fatticcioni <mfatticcioni(at)mbigroup(dot)it
> wrote:
> I was wondering if there is another way to set up a complete cluster
> that would manage in case of failure:
>
> * the relocation of the VIP (virtual ip address)
> * the relocation of the main instance of Postgresql
>
Consider trying pgpool. It has an HA mode (and I think the latest version
works using a heartbeat, the older one uses watchdog).
If you are up for a commercial product, you may want to consider using
something like EnterpriseDB's failover manager.
Best Regards,
*Sameer Kumar | Database Consultant*
*ASHNIK PTE. LTD.*
101 Cecil Street, #11-11 Tong Eng Building, Singapore 069533
M: *+65 8110 0350* T: +65 6438 3504 | www.ashnik.com
*[image: icons]*
[image: Email patch] <http://www.ashnik.com/>
This email may contain confidential, privileged or copyright material and
is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s).
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sameer Kumar | 2014-12-04 04:19:37 | Re: Synchronous Replication Timeout |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2014-12-03 23:59:15 | Re: Postgres 9.2 PITR testing to before DROP DATABASE ends up removing file system files |