Re: Protect a table against concurrent data changes while allowing to vacuum it

From: Sameer Kumar <sameer(dot)kumar(at)ashnik(dot)com>
To: Vlad Arkhipov <arhipov(at)dc(dot)baikal(dot)ru>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Protect a table against concurrent data changes while allowing to vacuum it
Date: 2016-06-22 09:20:34
Message-ID: CADp-Sm5LUFNhLV=BMB3R6HTJnFsWCMqDE32W6812npb+8gkPkw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 5:10 PM Vlad Arkhipov <arhipov(at)dc(dot)baikal(dot)ru> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I have a constraint that requires a table to be locked before checking
> it (i.e. no more than 2 records with the same value in the same column).
> If I lock the table in the SHARE ROW EXCLUSIVE mode, any vacuuming (or
> autovacuuming) process prevents me from checking the constraint. What
> are possible solutions?
>

May be you would like to share-
- Table Structure
- PostgreSQL version

This will help people who would try to help you.

I think you might want to consider an optimistic way of locking your
records, instead of locking them. Or look at advisory locks (but that
depends on your Postgres version).

>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
--
--
Best Regards
Sameer Kumar | DB Solution Architect
*ASHNIK PTE. LTD.*

101 Cecil Street, #11-11 Tong Eng Building, Singapore 069 533

T: +65 6438 3504 | M: +65 8110 0350 | www.ashnik.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Albe Laurenz 2016-06-22 09:58:53 Re: Protect a table against concurrent data changes while allowing to vacuum it
Previous Message Vlad Arkhipov 2016-06-22 09:10:04 Protect a table against concurrent data changes while allowing to vacuum it