Re: HOT standby with ONLY WAL shipping?

From: Sameer Kumar <sameer(dot)kumar(at)ashnik(dot)com>
To: CS_DBA <cs_dba(at)consistentstate(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: HOT standby with ONLY WAL shipping?
Date: 2014-06-17 09:15:53
Message-ID: CADp-Sm4=L24f_N7=3xVEj2GXogeGyJ8pwOOqzefvLbF1-svB=g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 1:01 AM, CS_DBA <cs_dba(at)consistentstate(dot)com> wrote:

> Is it possible to setup a hot standby based ONLY on WAL shipping and NOT
> use streaming replication?

If I am not wrong then what you are looking for is Archive Shipping​.
Any specific reason why you want to do that?

Anyways, you can use pg_receivexlog as well for setting up archives or for
setting up a replica. But if you are trying to avoid some other issue
w.r.t. streaming mechanism in PostgreSQL (which I assume will be very
specific to your environment), then this may not be very helpful as
pg_receivexlog too works on same streaming protocol and needs wal-sender
processes.

Best Regards,

*Sameer Kumar | Database Consultant*

*ASHNIK PTE. LTD.*

101 Cecil Street, #11-11 Tong Eng Building, Singapore 069533

M: *+65 8110 0350* T: +65 6438 3504 | www.ashnik.com

*[image: icons]*

[image: Email patch] <http://www.ashnik.com/>

This email may contain confidential, privileged or copyright material and
is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s).

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sameer Kumar 2014-06-17 09:21:01 Re: (Relatively) Oversized Checkpoint
Previous Message Andreas Joseph Krogh 2014-06-17 08:27:57 Re: How to store fixed size images?