On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I'm inclined to think that if we got this far without complaint, there's
> not a lot of point in writing new string-escaping support to solve what
> is now a legacy problem.
I'm fine with that - I wasn't even sure if I should bother reporting
the issue, except for the chance that this bug might have deeper
impact I hadn't thought of.
--
Stuart Bishop <stuart(at)stuartbishop(dot)net>
http://www.stuartbishop.net/