From: | Stuart Bishop <stuart(at)stuartbishop(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Ruslan Zakirov <ruz(at)bestpractical(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: avoiding seq scans when two columns are very correlated |
Date: | 2011-11-15 07:08:20 |
Message-ID: | CADmi=6MAPjCuGyLccX5qSYHtnar2C1UFg6AGogB+2UsQM0yGeg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Ruslan Zakirov <ruz(at)bestpractical(dot)com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A table has two columns id and EffectiveId. First is primary key.
> EffectiveId is almost always equal to id (95%) unless records are
> merged. Many queries have id = EffectiveId condition. Both columns are
> very distinct and Pg reasonably decides that condition has very low
> selectivity and picks sequence scan.
>
> Simple perl script that demonstrates estimation error:
> https://gist.github.com/1356744
>
> Estimation is ~200 times off (5 vs 950), for real situation it's very
> similar. Understandably difference depends on correlation coefficient.
>
> In application such wrong estimation result in seq scan of this table
> winning leading position in execution plans over other tables and
> index scans.
>
> What can I do to avoid this problem?
Does a partial index help? CREATE UNIQUE INDEX foo_idx ON mytab(id)
WHERE id = EffectiveId
--
Stuart Bishop <stuart(at)stuartbishop(dot)net>
http://www.stuartbishop.net/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Maciek Sakrejda | 2011-11-15 07:32:34 | Re: What's the state of postgresql on ext4 now? |
Previous Message | Cody Caughlan | 2011-11-15 01:04:20 | Re: Large number of short lived connections - could a connection pool help? |