From: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Statistics Import and Export |
Date: | 2025-02-25 20:31:40 |
Message-ID: | CADkLM=fv9eZM0tmWKK9kpsBuqQhQc_YM4Rb0dB8=dKwUJsfMsQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 1:22 PM Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2025-02-24 at 12:50 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Also, while working on the attached, I couldn't help forming the
> > opinion that we'd be better off to nuke pg_set_attribute_stats()
> > from orbit and require people to use pg_restore_attribute_stats().
>
> Attached a patch to do so. The docs and tests required substantial
> rework, but I think it's for the better now that we aren't trying to do
> in-place updates.
>
> Regards,
> Jeff Davis
>
>
All the C code changes make sense to me. Though as an aside, we're going to
run into the parameter-ordering problem when it comes to
pg_clear_attribute_stats, but that's a (read: my) problem for a later patch.
Documentation:
+ The currently-supported relation statistics are
+ <literal>relpages</literal> with a value of type
+ <type>integer</type>, <literal>reltuples</literal> with a value of
+ type <type>real</type>, and <literal>relallvisible</literal> with
a
+ value of type <type>integer</type>.
Could we make this a bullet-list? Same for the required attribute stats and
optional attribute stats. I think it would be more eye-catching and useful
to people skimming to recall the name of a parameter, which is probably
what most people will do after they've read it once to get the core
concepts.
Question:
Do we want to re-compact the oids we consumed in pg_proc.dat?
Test cases:
We're ripping out a lot of regression tests here. Some of them obviously
have no possible pg_restore_* analogs, such as explicitly set NULL values
vs omitting the param entirely, but some others may not, especially the
ones that test required arg-pairs.
Specifically missing are:
* regclass not found
* attribute is system column
* scalars can't have mcelem
* mcelem / mcelem freqs mismatch (parts 1 and 2)
* scalars can't have elem_count_histogram
* cannot set most_common_elems for range type
I'm less worried about all the tests of successful import calls, as the
pg_upgrade TAP tests kick those tires pretty well.
I'm also ok with losing the copies from test to test_clone, those are also
covered well by the TAP tests.
I'd feel better if we adapted the above tests from set-tests to
restore-tests, as the TAP suite doesn't really cover intentionally bad
stats.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Yogesh Sharma | 2025-02-25 21:02:59 | Re: Securing PostgreSQL for rootless containers |
Previous Message | Matheus Alcantara | 2025-02-25 20:29:29 | Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions |