| From: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: More efficient RI checks - take 2 |
| Date: | 2020-04-22 19:13:19 |
| Message-ID: | CADkLM=fuQbAMtwc0=2POyxn1wsKAPh73o85FjJPxY2KFK+Ka2Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 2:36 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2020-04-22 13:46:22 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 1:18 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > > Well, I was actually thinking in building ready-made execution trees,
> > > bypassing the planner altogether. But apparently no one thinks that
> > > this is a good idea, and we don't have any code that does that already,
> > > so maybe it's not a great idea.
>
> I was commenting on what I understood Corey to say, but was fairly
> unclear about it. But I'm also far from sure that I understood Corey
> correctly...
>
I was unclear because, even after my failed foray into statement level
triggers for RI checks, I'm still pretty inexperienced in this area.
I'm just happy that it's being discussed.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-04-22 19:29:29 | Re: Header / Trailer Comment Typos for M4 macros |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2020-04-22 19:07:38 | Re: 2pc leaks fds |