Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks

From: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks
Date: 2021-12-21 02:21:05
Message-ID: CADkLM=fXhf6u5kmRPXO3AaVXQk_dG6psv_SFXkV+0TVT_tFTMg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
>
>
> Good catch, thanks. Patch updated.
>
>
>
Applies clean. Passes check-world.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2021-12-21 02:49:33 Re: sequences vs. synchronous replication
Previous Message Greg Nancarrow 2021-12-21 01:55:52 Re: PublicationActions - use bit flags.