| From: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Statistics Import and Export |
| Date: | 2024-12-21 10:11:19 |
| Message-ID: | CADkLM=fXFB63EKR7MCYkM1g1R3JgjaqZV_ReRGEvj585+-sMVw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
>
> I like the description "STATISTICS DATA" because it differentiates from
>
You have Tomas to thank for that:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/bf724b21-914a-4497-84e3-49944f9776f6%40enterprisedb.com
the extended stats definitions. It might be worth differentiating
> between "RELATION STATISTICS DATA" and "ATTRIBUTE STATISTICS DATA" but
> I'm not sure if there's value in that.
>
I have no objection to such a change, even if we don't currently have a use
for the differentiation, someone in the future might.
>
> But how did you determine what to use for the .tag and prefix? In the
> output, it uses the form:
>
It was the minimal change needed to meet Tomas's suggestion.
> Statistics for Name: ...; Name: ...; Type: STATISTICS DATA; ...
>
I like this one best, because it clarifies the meaning of STATISTICS DATA.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-12-21 10:47:06 | Re: pure parsers and reentrant scanners |
| Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2024-12-21 09:20:04 | Re: Row pattern recognition |