| From: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: documentation structure |
| Date: | 2024-04-17 06:46:53 |
| Message-ID: | CADkLM=eohgf7TjMRccP+k37+vvcmbi+iRQHQX-ubqtFZYsd6cA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> > This sounds to me like it would be a painful exercise with not a
> > lot of benefit in the end.
>
> Maybe we could _verify_ the contents of func.sgml against pg_proc.
>
All of the functions redefined in catalog/system_functions.sql complicate
using pg_proc.dat as a doc generator or source of validation. We'd probably
do better to validate against a live instance, and even then the benefit
wouldn't be great.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | wenhui qiu | 2024-04-17 06:52:16 | Re: allow changing autovacuum_max_workers without restarting |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-04-17 06:38:48 | Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNIQUE constraint in btree index. |