Re: contrib modules and relkind check

From: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: contrib modules and relkind check
Date: 2017-03-06 18:10:49
Message-ID: CADkLM=eo6K2zuBxaP6F+HFe_Rw+UbbPq6zoppbM1ovjQgKubXg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 1:30 AM, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> Hm... It may be a good idea to be consistent on the whole system and
> refer to "partitioned table" as a table without storage and used as an
> entry point for partitions. The docs use this term in CREATE TABLE,
> and we would finish with messages like "not a table or a partitioned
> table". Extra thoughts are welcome here, the current inconsistencies
> would be confusing for users.
>

Updated CF status to "Waiting on Author". Waiting, mostly for the
regression tests suggested.

Michael, do you want to add yourself as a reviewer?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-03-06 18:21:58 Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-03-06 18:07:06 Re: PATCH: Make pg_stop_backup() archive wait optional