| From: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Torsten Förtsch <tfoertsch123(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PGSERVICEFILE as part of a normal connection string |
| Date: | 2024-11-20 07:58:43 |
| Message-ID: | CADkLM=eZd=gC042vOfjYrZf40QHtk+SEhHZKogCRaf=XCnOeDw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
>
>
> Interesting. We've never had tests for that even for "service".
> Perhaps it would be the time to add some tests for the existing case
> and the one you are adding? Your test suite should make that easy to
> add.
>
Currently, a lot of our utility scripts (anything that uses
connectDatabase) don't support service=name params or PGSERVICE=name env
vars, which is really too bad. I previously thought that this was because
of a lack of interest, but perhaps people do want it?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | vignesh C | 2024-11-20 07:59:29 | Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation |
| Previous Message | Vladimir Sitnikov | 2024-11-20 07:48:22 | pg_prepared_xacts returns transactions that are foreign to the caller |