On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 8:44 AM Jürgen Purtz <juergen(at)purtz(dot)de> wrote:
> +1 and many thanks to Alvaros edits.
>
>
I did some of the grunt work Alvaro alluded to in v6, and the results are
attached and they build, which means there are no invalid links.
Notes:
* no definition wordings were changed
* added a linkend to all remaining glossterms that do not immediately
follow a glossentry
* renamed id glossary-temporary-tables to glossary-temporary-table
* temporarily re-added an id for glossary-row as we have many references to
that. unsure if we should use the term Tuple in all those places or say Row
while linking to glossary-tuple, or something else
* temporarily re-added an id for glossary-segment, glossary-wal-segment,
glossary-analytic-function, as those were also referenced and will need
similar decisions made
* added a stub entry for glossary-unique-index, unsure if it should have a
definition on it's own, or we split it into unique and index.
* I noticed several cases where a glossterm is used twice in a definition,
but didn't de-term them
* I'm curious about how we should tag a term when using it in its own
definition. same as anywhere else?