| From: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: documentation structure |
| Date: | 2024-04-29 05:17:39 |
| Message-ID: | CADkLM=eLKkMf-R8eW5hfVA5nBCeCzQgrPnDTGSUo4ENr18H9Xg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> I've splitted it to7 patches.
> each patch split one <sect1> into separate new files.
>
Seems like a good start. Looking at the diffs of these, I wonder if we
would be better off with a func/ directory, each function gets its own file
in that dir, and either these files above include the individual files, or
the original func.sgml just becomes the organizer of all the functions.
That would allow us to do future reorganizations with minimal churn, make
validation of this patch a bit more straightforward, and make it easier for
future editors to find the function they need to edit.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-04-29 05:25:10 | Re: A failure in prepared_xacts test |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-04-29 05:11:00 | Re: A failure in prepared_xacts test |