From: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, PostgreSQL <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: PSQL commands: \quit_if, \quit_unless) |
Date: | 2017-03-02 19:47:46 |
Message-ID: | CADkLM=e3vpXixqQd9X_wD0LVL1vkrq4oPu33xzsTr3CokSRnWA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
>
> For me, it is only slightly better: I think that for helping understanding
> and maintenance, the automaton state transitions should be all clear and
> loud in just one place, so I would really like to see a single common
> structure:
>
> if (is "if") switch on all states;
> else if (is "elif") switch on all states;
> else if (is "else") switch on all states;
> else if (is "endif") switch on all states;
>
> And minimal necessary error handling around that.
>
>
v20: attempt at implementing the switch-on-all-states style.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001.if_endif.v20.diff | text/plain | 32.7 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2017-03-02 19:52:48 | Re: Performance degradation in TPC-H Q18 |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2017-03-02 19:17:12 | Re: patch: function xmltable |