Re: onlyvalue aggregate (was: First Aggregate Funtion?)

From: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: onlyvalue aggregate (was: First Aggregate Funtion?)
Date: 2015-11-22 01:16:51
Message-ID: CADkLM=dK6fiFqiBytNQYLGW21SMHDYaU17_7m=Bqerrp3=GkEg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:54 PM, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to> wrote:

> Hi Dean,
>
> Here's v2 of the patch. How's this look?
>
>
> .m
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
>
Sorry I didn't see this thread sooner.

I haven't applied the patch, but the test cases illustrate that the
function does everything I want, and has inspired me to think a bit about
some other assert-ish functions. Thanks!

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2015-11-22 04:15:25 Re: GIN pending list clean up exposure to SQL
Previous Message Marko Tiikkaja 2015-11-22 00:54:51 Re: COPY (INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE .. RETURNING ..)