From: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, mkellycs(at)gmail(dot)com, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [POC] FETCH limited by bytes. |
Date: | 2015-12-23 18:15:36 |
Message-ID: | CADkLM=dDy9GTf03G5t+FVshj584K5bahdZWVKbGnR==iCC1qng@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > Attached is the patch / diff against current master.
>
> I have moved this patch to next CF, there is a new patch, but no reviews.
> --
> Michael
>
That's fair. I'm still at a loss for how to show that the fetch size was
respected by the remote server, suggestions welcome!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-12-23 18:16:55 | Parallel pg_dump's error reporting doesn't work worth squat |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-12-23 18:12:48 | Re: Parallel Aggregate |